|
CRS's Current
Advocacy Efforts
Historic Preservation and
Sustainability
Sustainable
development demands ways of living and working that enable people to
lead healthy, fulfilling, and economically secure lives without
destroying the welfare of future generations. When we think of
sustainable design and green building, we often think of new
construction and new technologies that are designed to complement local
conditions, making the best of the available light, wind, rain and
terrain.
But aren't historic buildings and the neighborhoods in which
they are found inherently sustainable? Features of historic structures,
such as large operable windows and high ceilings, make them well suited
to maximize available resources. Moreover, preserving historic buildings
maximizes the use of existing materials and infrastructure, reduces
waste and preserves the historic character of older cities and suburbs.
At our 34th annual Community Luncheon on November 21, 2006,
Donovan Rypkema, principal of Place Economics, a Washington, D.C.-based
real estate and economic development consulting firm, made the
connection between historic preservation and sustainable Development.
|
|
|
Read
Donovan
Rypkema's Keynote Speech,
to learn more about how historic preservation can be used to
promote economic, environmental, cultural, and social
responsibility and address issues such as the affordable housing
crisis.
In
October 2006 the first National Summit on the Greening of
Historic properties was held in Pittsburgh. The Summit featured
experts in the disciplines of both green building and historic
preservation in a discussion regarding existing LEED
certification requirements as they relate to preservation.
Find out more about the Summit, including the resulting
White Paper, from the Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation.
How You Can Help
For more information on
making the connection between historic preservation and
sustainability, please call the Society at (216) 426-1000.
State Historic Preservation
Tax Credit Passed
Ohio's historic
preservation tax credit was signed into law on January 2. The new law creates a two-year pilot program that allows 100 rehabilitation projects in each of the next two years. Projects that meet the criteria
can be submitted beginning July 1.
Read
the
full text of the legislation as enrolled.
How You Can Help
For more information on the
state's new historic preservation tax credit, please call the
Society at (216) 426-1000.
Rehabilitation
of Historic Schools Makes Economic Sense

John Hay School |
The Cleveland Municipal
School District could save $66.4 million by rehabilitating
23 schools eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places. |
The Cleveland Restoration Society (CRS) has been deeply
involved in the issue of historic neighborhood schools for
the last four years. Neighborhood schools are typically
anchors in communities, and often represent a community’s
largest investment in art and architecture.
|
|
 |
| |
William Cullen Bryant |
Indeed, despite years of deferred
maintenance, in Cleveland, we estimate that forty-nine buildings
in the Cleveland Municipal School District (CMSD) portfolio are
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Despite
this, only recently has the Ohio Schools Facilities Commission
(OSFC) recognized the value of these buildings by allowing for
greater flexibility in the administration of their guidelines
for state funding. Charged with disseminating an estimated $10.2
billion (proposed) and $3.6 billion in funds (appropriated) for
rebuilding Ohio’s schools, the commission has adopted an
onerous set of rules grossly slanted against rehabilitation of
existing structures.
 |
The
most offending rule, the “two-thirds” rule, now
relaxed to a “guideline,” states that when the
rehabilitation of a school costs over two-thirds of the cost
of new construction, the school must be replaced. This philosophy
has permeated the thinking of the agency, despite the fact
that billions of tax dollars would be saved through rehabilitation.
By our estimate, using OSFC cost figures, the CMSD could save
$66.4 million if it chose to rehabilitate 23 of its schools
rather than demolish and replace them. This number was developed
based upon the OSFC’s own calculations of costs of rehabilitation
versus new construction and adds in a modest cost per square
foot for demolition ($7.10 per square foot). Check
the math here. The calculation is very simplistic
in that it does not factor in the myriad of decisions about
location and clustering the CMSD is challenged with, so in
this regard this statement is not a complete picture, but
helps make our point that rehabilitation can be more cost-effective
than new construction. Rehabilitation is also better for the
local economy in that more jobs are created than in new construction
that spends a larger proportion of the budget on purchase
of construction materials rather than on the wages of workers. |
|
|
William Cullen Bryant
historic detail |
|
 |
|
Albert
Bushnell Hart
historic detail |
|
A
few words about the Cleveland district – the rebuilding
project is enormous, with $1.5 billion at stake, the largest
single infrastructure project in the history of the city of
Cleveland. It was our district that added considerable weight
to the effort to change the state policy regarding the two-thirds
rule as it recognized the impracticality of replacing so many
of its buildings. Older urban districts, when analyzing their
buildings in light of the state policy, immediately reacted
to the unreasonableness of wholesale replacement of older
schools.
| The Cleveland Restoration Society,
in partnership with the Cleveland Municipal School District,
has completed a preservation feasibility study of four historic
schools currently slated for demolition and replacement under
the district’s
Master Plan. The study concludes that renovating these four buildings,
rather than replacing them, would save the district $17 million.
(Read the executive summary of our report here.)
The Cleveland Restoration Society hopes that the impact of these
results will open the door for the preservation of many more
schools when feasible, to keep traditional neighborhood schools
in serve while meeting the highest of educational standards for
our children. |
|

|
| |
Albert Bushnell Hart
Junior High School |
How You Can Help
For more information on the
Society's efforts to save Cleveland's neighborhood schools or to join
the Society’s efforts, please call (216) 426-1000.
The Cozad-Bates House
11508 Mayfield Road, Cleveland
Historical Significance
| Set back from Mayfield
Road, this two-story, red-brick Italianate residence is the
only pre-Civil War-era structure remaining in University Circle.
Its original section, at the rear, was built in 1853 by Andrew
Cozad for his son, Justus L. Cozad. Justus Cozad’s grandfather,
Samuel Cozad, settled in Cleveland in 1806. |
|
 |
| |
The Cozad-Bates House |
The Cozad
family owned a large section of the land which is now occupied
by Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals, Severance
Hall, the Cleveland Museum of Art, and Lakeview Cemetery. Through
marriage, the Cozads were linked to other pioneer families of the
Western Reserve, the Bates and Fords.
A City of Cleveland Landmarks Commission investigation
revealed strong circumstantial evidence for linking the oldest
section of
the house with the Underground Railroad and documented that the
University Circle area was a major center of Abolitionist and Underground
Railroad activity during the three decades preceding the Civil
War.
Over 40,000 fugitive slaves were transported over the Ohio Underground
Railroad, aided by over 1,500 operators or station masters. The
Underground Railroad activities of the Cozads and the Fords in
1853-1860 are well documented. Several of their homes were documented
safe houses. Unfortunately, none of them have survived.
 |
|
“At one time he
[Andrew Cozad] used to get good Americans to work as farm hands…At
one time it was Run Away Slaves. The Dred Scott Decision put
a stop to that. I myself have worked many a day in the field
with run away slaves and always sat at the table to eat with
them.” — Justus L. Cozad |
Another view of Cozad-Bates |
|
Architectural Significance
| In addition to its association
with one of Cleveland’s pioneer families and the Abolitionist
Movement, the Cozad-Bates House is an excellent and unique
example of the Italianate residential style. It faces north
with a large lawn on Mayfield Road. The main cubical block
has a hipped roof with a low cupola or belvedere. This feature
has a pyramidal roof with a spear-shaped finial. Paired brackets
support the wide roof eaves. The round-arched windows have
a simple recessed molding and stone keystones. The main doorway
has a large semi-circular arch, and its original doors with
heavy molded paneling. A wooden veranda graces the north front
of the house. All of these features are typical of the Italianate
style, however the Cozad-Bates House is distinguished by two
bay windows on the north façade and one on the west,
which are curved rather than the typical multi-angular shape.
A long rectangular block projects south from the main block.
The east side of this south wing features a recessed porch. |
|
 |
| |
 |
| |

Cozad-Bates details |
The western bay window and the west flank of the south wing have
had large segmental-arched windows inserted in them at a later
date, circa 1900. The interior has been divided into several apartments.
The woodwork and stair of the main entrance hall are intact, however
partitioning has eliminated any semblance of an articulated residential
space.
Current Status
The Cozad-Bates House was listed in the National Register of Historic
Places in 1974. National Register listing, however, is only honorific
and does not offer protection from insensitive changes or demolition.
The Cozad-Bates House sat abandoned and deteriorated – a
classic case of a structure threatened with demolition by neglect – for
many years. In 2003, the city of Cleveland cited the property’s
owner, University Hospitals, for extensive housing code violations.
In 2006, University Hospitals donated the property to University
Circle, Inc. (UCI) and the city of Cleveland. The Cleveland Restoration
Society is now working with UCI to stabilize the house. Initial
exterior stabilization, temporary protection measures, has been
completed. This work included covering chimneys, patching holes in
roof soffits, installing flashings, and installing a temporary,
secure front door. All physical conditions and activities have been
well documented before, during, and after installation. Also, a
licensed abatement contractor has completed the asbestos abatement
of the basement areas. Our staff will continue to work with UCI as a
historic structures conditions survey and preservation plan for the
house is completed.
How You Can Help
For more information on how you can help
save the Cozad-Bates House or to join the Society’s Advocacy
Committee, please call (216) 426-1000.
Cleveland's Group Plan
The Cleveland
Group Plan of 1903 is the earliest and most complete civic-center
plan for a major city outside Washington, D.C. Listed in
the National Register of Historic Places, the Group Plan
district is a T-shaped area, which is bounded roughly by
East 9th Street to the east, Superior Avenue to the south,
East 6th Street to the west and the retaining wall that runs
behind the County Courthouse and City Hall.
|
|

|

|
|
The Group
Plan embodies the ideals of the City Beautiful Movement and
late nineteenth century Progressivism. It was the first plan
for the grouping of public buildings realized in an already
built-up city, and is the earliest and most elaborate civic
center plan outside of Washington, D. C., at the time of
its conception. Many from throughout the nation traveled
to Cleveland to see the physical embodiment of their ideals
and took what they learned home with them to formulate plans
for their own cities. |
The Cleveland Restoration Society is pursuing
National Historic Landmark status for Cleveland’s Group Plan.
Learn more about Cleveland’s Group Plan by viewing this presentation created
by the Society with a grant from the Ohio Historic Preservation
Office. Download a copy of the nomination form here.
How You Can Help
For more information on how you can help save Cleveland’s
Group Plan buildings or to join the Society’s Advocacy Committee,
please call (216) 426-1000.
back to top
|
|
|